Because they always argue in bad faith based on a surface level reading of headlines. It’s always the same story. I see a “tankie” citing research, statistics, historical texts on one side, and on the other I see someone like you, floundering. It’s embarrassing, and a waste of time, because you’re not in this in good faith. You never really engage with the arguments. So what’s the point?
Please show me where the tankie cited research, statistics or historical texts.
You’re embarrassing yourself here. And you’re not in good faith either. I am in absolutely the best of faiths and have not made a single bad faith argument in this entire thread. Get off your high horse. You don’t own the truth.
Because they won’t agree with your simplistic tankie views?
Because they always argue in bad faith based on a surface level reading of headlines. It’s always the same story. I see a “tankie” citing research, statistics, historical texts on one side, and on the other I see someone like you, floundering. It’s embarrassing, and a waste of time, because you’re not in this in good faith. You never really engage with the arguments. So what’s the point?
Please show me where the tankie cited research, statistics or historical texts.
You’re embarrassing yourself here. And you’re not in good faith either. I am in absolutely the best of faiths and have not made a single bad faith argument in this entire thread. Get off your high horse. You don’t own the truth.