cm0002@toast.ooo to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoJust so there's no confusionlemmy.mlimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1870arrow-down120
arrow-up1850arrow-down1imageJust so there's no confusionlemmy.mlcm0002@toast.ooo to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squareJackFrostNCola@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoCorrect, not the first egg laying animal, however the first chicken was hatched from a chicken egg.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoNo, I don’t think I’d agree. Something gave birth to something with a mutation that caused it to lay eggs that we’d call chicken eggs that produce chicken. Itself was born from a creature that didn’t lay chicken eggs.
Correct, not the first egg laying animal, however the first chicken was hatched from a chicken egg.
No, I don’t think I’d agree. Something gave birth to something with a mutation that caused it to lay eggs that we’d call chicken eggs that produce chicken. Itself was born from a creature that didn’t lay chicken eggs.