MTZ@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 hours agoHopefully, he will be 6 underground by that time.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square385fedilinkarrow-up1998arrow-down1114
arrow-up1884arrow-down1external-linkHopefully, he will be 6 underground by that time.lemmy.worldMTZ@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 hours agomessage-square385fedilink
minus-squareWoodScientist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down5·7 hours agoAre you seriously citing Senate voting history for what makes a good candidate? This is why liberals lose. They simply don’t have the sauce.
minus-squaretimbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·4 hours agoAre you seriously suggesting someone’s ACTIONS aren’t a good indicator? What an idiot.
minus-squarer1veRRR@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·6 hours agoWhat’s your alternative that isn’t completely insane, “The Revolution will come” levels stupid? What a politician actually supports (instead of what they say) is the CLOSEST we will ever get objective proof of a candidates position.
Are you seriously citing Senate voting history for what makes a good candidate? This is why liberals lose. They simply don’t have the sauce.
Are you seriously suggesting someone’s ACTIONS aren’t a good indicator?
What an idiot.
What’s your alternative that isn’t completely insane, “The Revolution will come” levels stupid? What a politician actually supports (instead of what they say) is the CLOSEST we will ever get objective proof of a candidates position.