GreenDust@lemmings.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-23 days agoJesus nutlemmings.worldexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1510arrow-down112
arrow-up1498arrow-down1external-linkJesus nutlemmings.worldGreenDust@lemmings.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-23 days agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squaregigastasio@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up118·3 days agoAs someone who tests materials and parts like this for a living, I can look at that part and say with 100% certainty that it will last for a period of time.
minus-squarefunkajunk 🇨🇦@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27·3 days agoNanoseconds are technically a period of time, yes.
minus-squareNeondragon25@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·3 days agoI think we can get a bigger number if we just measure in femtoseconds. And bigger number is better.
As someone who tests materials and parts like this for a living, I can look at that part and say with 100% certainty that it will last for a period of time.
Nanoseconds are technically a period of time, yes.
I think we can get a bigger number if we just measure in femtoseconds. And bigger number is better.