• Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is grim, but those of us born in the 80s will remember how absolutely obsessed the media was with Britney Spears becoming “legal” and reporting on her virginity every chance they got.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 hours ago

      UK newspapers would frequently publish photos of 16 years old girls with their tits out. That was only made illegal in 2004.

      Back during Paedomania of the early 2000s, Brass Eye had an episode taking the piss out of the press’s new found moral crusade, despite them happily being in on it for the better part of 30 years. The press did not like this at all. Unfortunately they didn’t seem to realise they were at fault, which led to the memorable juxtaposition of an article about “perv spoof bosses” on the opposite side of the page from an article about how big 15 year old Charlotte Church’s boobs were getting.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think that was still very much a thing at least a decade after Britney became legal.

      Gif reminder that Daenerys is 13 at the start of GoT. But ofc the actress was 24 in s1 so not really anything controversial.

      I can’t say for sure that actresses ages were tracked as much but I remember like sites showing countdowns to when Emma Watson became of legal age. I’m the same age roughly so it wasn’t weird for me but it was weird that people did it.

      And still do.

      https://medium.com/@yomiadegoke/counting-down-to-female-celebrities-turning-legal-is-more-than-crass-its-dangerous-94f8abbf4674

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I actually do not remember that because I actively ignored all popular music, all royal family, all oj simpson, and the rest. I still do. Oh yeah, also actor’s names, I try not to learn them.

  • cub Gucci@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is it me or is this a recent trend of making the impression that paedophilia in the 70s-80s was normal? Like a week or so

    • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Hasn’t noticed that but now you mention it, yeah shit this is definitely a subversive attempt to save the predator class.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Today, it looks like the Brooke Shields situation was normal for the time, but I assure you that it wasn’t. Plenty of people called out the behavior of those around her, and it led to the tighter restrictions on childhood sexual exploitation that we see today. There’s a reason why Brooke Shields is pretty much a solo act - when Hollywood handlers tried to cross boundaries with her, they got slapped down pretty quickly, and nobody really followed.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The problem didn’t just appear suddenly. Why do you think the situation in the US is what it is? Trash like trump don’t see anything wrong with raping kids. This problem goes back to the beginning of time. We evolve socially but they stay in their caves.

    • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It wasn’t just America. There was code used with women, girls about whose knee to avoid sitting on etc. Some people realized it was wrong but for the most part, society’s way of dealing was to ignore and pretend it wasn’t happening. And if a girl got pregnant - it was all her fault. The difference was the greater reach of TV, cable, magazines than previous decades which started to undo the secrecy. As much a people hate on Boomers, they were the ones who started saying enough already, there needs to be laws against this if people can’t figure out on their own that it is wrong.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      We have accountability problems too on so many levels. Pedophilia is a good pace to start. As a society we should deal with pedophiles harshly, no matter who they are. A system where the rich are allowed to circumvent the law is our reality, but we should draw the line before pedophilia. If a rich person does what the Epstein abusers did, they should be at the mercy of the accused and their family, even if it means their death. Chain the abuser to a wall and let the abused and their families into the room with a crowbar. Thats simple justice and its long overdue.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The problem with that is false convictions happen. There were hundreds of false convictions for child rape and devil worship in living memory, in the 80s and 90s, the Satanic Panic.

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not just america but other countries are better at ignoring it or in some cases dealing with it effectively. Some still allow it even if its officially illegal. The current US leaders want this as well.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    The 1970s… some people romanticizing it because they think it’s cool and cheesy, kids are “latchkey” and no one trying to mind your manners. In reality drug abuse was really full-on, some US cities were plagued by crime in the open, there were all kinds of shock and gore movies, and sexual permissiveness is so low that even minors are not spared – like boys from junior high literally talking about eventually getting laid.

    Magazines like that one are so much a reflection of the views of the time, and this article has the author alternately despising “mainstream” culture while simultaneously selling her as a sex object.

    No one should wonder why some men “thriving” from that decade were really fucked up, now curb-stomping civil rights so that they could get their own “freedoms”.

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think it was when the gold standard ended, and poverty was rampant as all the debt unwound. Black unemployment was 30%.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You do realize, well several things, the inflation rate wasn’t as understated then as now. The Unemployment rate wasn’t as understated as now, they only count people receiving unemployment benefits as unemployed, it’s a worthless number.

        But by 1980 the Business Roundtable of 1971’s long game to unmake liberal democracy and the new deal and resulting gains of unions and the middle class was in full swing, they cooperated together on what they agreed on, which included reducing us to poverty, and making a police state, to get to where we are heading now, fascism.

        The first thing that I mentioned, the inflation rate, meant that at that point, we had not gone through a half century of inflation registered at 2-3 percent when in fact it was 5-8 percent, under the old unchanged standard, changed in bad faith by said illiberal forces. So a minimum wage job could still support a family, but by the 80s that was noticeably becoming less true.

  • Pika@rekabu.ru
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Because 70’s were WILD for that shit.

    Should I remind you that street marches were held in the name of “adult-child love”? That NAMBLA, a North-American Man-Boy Love Association (you can’t make this shit up) tried to meddle with LGBTQ+ to get included? That songs were written about teenage girls being taught “adult love”?

    If anything, the article is characteristic of the time.