• FYI: Bail is not a get out of jail free card

    Its just setting down a sort of “security deposit” and promising to go to the court date, and they’ll take your money if you don’t show up to court and also issue a warrant for your arrest. You still have to face a trial.

    If you are considered “dangerous”, they could deny letting you go on bail.

    So not really a whole lot of “chaos”. It’s actually a good thing to let people go if they a haven’t been convicted of a crime yet. Cuz keeping innocent people (cuz that’s what they are before a conviction) in custody is injustice.

    • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      There are also laws about who can post bail for you. My understanding is that they need to either have an actual relationship with you or be a licensed bondsman. Either be someone who can guilt you into going to court or who will hire a bounty hunter to haul you in.

      (And bail bonds are unfair bullshit, but that’s a different thing.)

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I don’t think this is a thing. The court could reject you if you’re suspicious, but I don’t think there are laws saying “you need a blood relationship to post bail for someone”

        • The court could reject you if you’re suspicious, but I don’t think there are laws saying “you need a blood relationship to post bail for someone”

          Now court could reject bailing-out someone is BLANKING BS! If it is true, then must be removed!

          Blood relationship requirement is just not true.

          • FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I haven’t a clue what the rules are but I don’t think anybody was suggesting you had to have a blood relationship to bail someone out. I think they were suggesting you have to know the person, be a friend or colleague or have some kind of connection to them as opposed to some stranger just walking in and bailing out random people like I suggested in my original post

  • MCGiorgi@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Or become president and pardon them all. Wait. Didn’t that already happen?

  • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    What if it sorta-kinda already happened, with the people in question furthermore being employed in federal immigration services?

  • Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’d love to see someone do the math, I’d bet one dude could bail out every eligible person in the US. Probably wouldn’t even have to be Musk/Bezos/Gates.

    • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’d cost about $36 billion, assuming roughly 665,000 people are on bail nationwide in the US, and the average Pennsylvania (couldn’t find anywhere else) bail amount of $55,400. There are ~902 billionaires in the US according to Forbes, though some of them are likely under $36 billion.