• AverageGoob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why does it matter if they add the option for ai? You have to configure a provider yourself or setup a local one (cool idea) so I don’t really see the problem with giving the option to those who want it.

      • Brewchin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because the Argument of Excluded Middle (aka false dichotomy) logical fallacy is king now. With no middle ground for compromise, if you’re not 100% for a position then you have to be 100% against that position. It’s the rules.

        So, with that batshittery in mind, anything that allows you to optionally use something that people (justifiably) detest is, of course, the literal devil.

        I blame brain worms.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I recently heard a great interview with the President of Mozilla where he basically says exactly this. It’s all about options. Yes, Firefox now incorporates AI, but it makes it super easy to turn it off if you want. Which is a major contrast from Microsoft and Google which shove it down your throat.

          Link to interview with timecode.

          That’s the nuance you need. Give people the option to do what they want. Make it easy either way.

          • Brewchin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            While user consent (default on vs default off, or any choice at all) is a different-but-related topic, Mozilla bake it all in, enable it all by default, and make it difficult to disable. (Settings would be “super easy” and would show it was intended as a permanent choice.)

            These aren’t actions and design decisions indicative of having the best interests of users in mind. Especially given how closed the mobile client already is.

            It seems to be designed in a way that leaves Mozilla the option of removing the ability to disable it, presumably if it becomes profitable enough and/or they think they can get away with it.

            But for now on this point they get a pass from me on the desktop version in a personal environment where the user has the most control.

          • upandatom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I disagree with you too.

            They never offer you the choice. The turn it on by default, and do not even inform you of how or where to turn it off.

            Giving users a choice would mean an option during install or first run.

            1. How should Firefox incorporate AI on this profile? A) running when FF starts B) turn on AI at user request at time of request C) disable all AI on this profile

            That to me looks like choice. I do use Firefox as my main.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Do you know if it maintains compatibility with all APIs and plugins? It’s extensibility and interoperability are what makes it so popular.

  • DarkSirrush@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Has it been updated to modern python yet, or is the dude still insisting on patching an unsupported version still?

  • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Am I the only who keeps getting errors when try to update the Windows version of Calibre.

    It’s a cool application, not being able to upgrade is so annoying.

      • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I believe I did try a install/reinstall.

        I looked up the installer codes and it implied there was an access restriction, but I of course tried running the installer as admin and this didn’t help.