• massacre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That’s crazy talk right there. After decades of who knows how many Linux distros, SunOS/Solaris, HPUX, AIX (and a splash of FreeBSD), the proper answer is this:

    • Mint
    • Already correct! >Mint
    • Mint
    • Mint - hardened if external
    • I’ll allow it

    Non-Linux

    • por que!? OOF… this should be Mint or really any Linux is better
    • I’ll allow it, though I find OMV to be better for various reasons

    Not gatekeeping - just having a bit of fun. You do you, but I found it crazy supporting so many distros after all these years. At some point you go for “works great out of the box with minimal tinkering” that covers like 99% of use cases and frees up your time. That being said I’m sure I have a system or two around here still running Ubuntu or Debian or whatever that I just can’t be arsed to change.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      I do like the dedication to Mint! To be honest it’s generally my default pick if I need to slap Linux onto something. I actually tried putting it on the gaming table machine but for reasons I didn’t feel like digging into it just did not cooperate, and Debian did.

      CachyOS on the luggable gaming machine is mostly just because I hadn’t used it before and wanted to give it a spin. So far so good.

      As for the Windows machine, it’s a gaming rig and at the time it was built, pre-steam deck, Linux wasn’t quite yet in as good a position for that as it is now. I just can’t be bothered to switch it mid-stream as it were. It’s almost certainly going to be the last Windows machine I ever own though.