Scientists are considering the idea that our perception of reality is shaped not only by our senses but by our brains creating an internal map or model of the world around us.

This means our perception of what’s true or real is malleable, and we are at risk of losing our grasp on it. The result can be tragedies like the Jonestown mass suicide and Nazi Germany.

Some philosophers think that evolution cares more about how to survive than about any accurate version of reality, which can lead to “useful fictions” about the world.

  • Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago

    That’s why I made sure to caveat it with a “grain a truth.” Not saying it’s exactly the same, only that it does share some similarities.

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No they are two completely distinct theories which only both use the word simulate but in a completely different context. And one is not more true than the other because both are just philosophical ideas.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        one is not more true than the other because both are just philosophical ideas.

        I think I disagree. One is a basically untestable hypothesis, the other is pretty much the closest we can come to objective truth.