• samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The second one. The boat is meant to represent a dragon, just without the appendages, and the second one is where its back legs would be. Could also have a pair for up front, I suppose.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That begs the question if pants are a “back legs only, not front legs”, or “legs only, not arms”.

      Taking it to the extreme, would pants for a centipede look more like a tube with “sleeves” all along it or just like a tiny pair of normal (to us) pants?

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        This was under the assumption that it’s a 4 legged dragon. If the theoretical front appendages are arms, no pants up front. Although thinking about it again, with no junk to protect, front pants are kinda useless, so maybe don’t bother with them at all.

        I’d say for any animal with multiple legs that are very close together, no pants at all would be best. At that point they’d be more of a hindrance than a help!