• zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The distros that tout themselves as user-friendly come with pretty much everything an average, non-power-user would need pre-installed ootb: Internet browser, file browser, media player, app store, and some sort of settings app/menu to fiddle with basic things like screen resolution, input devices, audio settings, etc.

    Has your experience been different? Is there some specific distro or some specific missing/confusing feature you’re talking about?

    • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m not speaking from personal experience as such because I’ve been using Linux since the late 90’s, but I do know a bunch of people who haven’t had great experiences with Linux, mainly due to eg wanting to run games – which is fairly easy nowadays thanks to Proton but it’s still not as stupid simple as just installing a game in Windows – or driver problems (esp graphics)

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Gotcha, thanks for clarifying. I definitely recognize that gaming isn’t 100% perfect on Linux yet, and graphics drivers can still be a pain. I think both of those statements hold true on Windows though, and I don’t think I’d consider a gamer an “average” PC user. PC gaming is a niche hobby. A large niche maybe, but it’s not the main thing people use a PC for. So I think it’s a little unfair to point to gaming-related issues when trying to claim that Linux isn’t user-friendly.