Not a lawyer, but if this isn’t a clear case of duress, then nothing is. Nobody with a functioning brain would say that someone begging a service to stop publishing generated sexual imagery of them is doing so under anything other than duress. That claim would be equivalent to saying someone agreed to your TOS when they begged you to stop stabbing their mother on your service.

have we considered flooding the internet with xai porn of lindsay graham blowing elon? trump’s clinton bj? stills of the recording of the russian pee tape? amy coney barrett pulling her g-string open so ted cruz can slip a dollar in?