• circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’ll say what I just said on a similar thread: if the internet goes down tomorrow, mesh will mean very little compared to ham radio.

    Any quality transceiver built in the last 100 years will be more useful. It is purely about how many exist, how long they last, and their requirements for use (which are effectively, power and antenna).

    Yes, there is a license that you need in non-emergency situations. It doesn’t change much anything in emergency situations, and it certainly doesn’t affect the fact that there are already millions of radios out there.

    I certainly wouldn’t throw away a mesh if the world was ending – I’d set it on the desk while finding contacts on HF (=world band) using a ham radio. My chances of contact there are at least an order of magnitude better.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 hour ago

      FYI if you’re ham licensed, you can boost the output power of your mesh radio. There’s a setting in most firmwares.

      • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If I recall correctly, you can, but it removes your node from the public networks everyone else is using because hams cannot use encryption for coms as part of the rules for ham operation, as the non ham network is encrypted by default. You would have to build a secondary network independent of the public node list.

        Correct me if I’m wrong. But that was my understanding of the difference.

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          You’re probably right. I noticed the feature, but haven’t personally tried it.

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Here meshtastic has become part of the emergency information network initiative. If there is a coms blackout, intercity/town civillian communications are to be handled by amateur radio enthusiast with licence and communications whitin the city/town will be handled by licence free systems. Meshtastic has been spreading well among the general public, so it has become most viable system to use at lowest level in the chain.

    • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve come to the realization that mesh nodes are little more than a gateway drug into the world of ham radio. And for that I’m grateful.

      It’s not as good, and does everything worse than radio. The only real world use I have found is for when cellphone networks get overwhelmed at things like music festivals and large sports games. No one else’s texts go through, but I can toss by buds a node to put in their back pocket and we can stay in touch.

      our local mature club is building our local mesh network out now as an introduction to the ham world. And it’s working. It’s getting the younger kids and adults through the door. And from there, it’s an easy thing to get them interested in more useful and fun forms of communication.

      • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’ve been fooling around with Meshtastic for a couple years and haven’t come up with a real world use for it yet, other than scenarios like you mentioned.

        What would be really cool is if cell phone makers could incorporate a mesh into their phones as a local public channel when the tower goes out. It would probably just be used by drug dealers or something, but it’s the only cool and functional idea I can come up with.

        • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          If they can’t charge an admittance fee or a per message fee, they won’t implement it. It goes against their business model.

          But we can dream.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Now that I like. And I think there is room for both – IF people know and understand the differences.

        Mesh against ham in an emergency is not even a competition, in my view. The numbers just aren’t there. But for random cellular failures etc, I see some utility.

        Personally, I’ve just seen so much more about mesh lately than ham, and it makes me sad. If it’s a gateway, as you suggest, then great. I worry that people see it as a novelty and not a gateway.

        • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Oh it’s a hundred percent just the novelty communication technology that is in vogue right now. I don’t really know if it’s a true zeitgeist technology or if someone with a lot of product to sell who is playing with the social media algorithm. But I guess I don’t really care much.

          The trick is to find a way to seize on that opportunity. Now that our mesh network is structurally sound and sufficient, I’m working on using a raspberry pi to automate our ham club meeting dates, testing dates, and field days, and then blast those messages once a week or so over the mesh network. That way, an impulse buy turns into the discovery of a fuctional network and afterwards, a random person can discover a whole local community of people with all sorts of new things to learn.

          You can lead a horse to water. But you can’t make him drink.

          first you need a trough. That’s the mesh network. After, the horse needs to be thirsty. That’s the curiosity people have. information, the when and how and where, you can automate and passively tell them about. that’s the water.