• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We had that consensus with Ubuntu for 15 years but haters had to hate so now we’re here. 😁

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I am convinced that Ubuntu/GNOME is the main reason that Linux onboarding has taken so long and has been so slow.

      I never knew KDE Plasma and other Windows-like desktop environments existed until Valve released the Steam Deck.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Kububtu (Ubuntu with KDE) has been an official Ubuntu flavour almost aince the beginning. During the Ubuntu consensus years, it was being promoted along with Ubuntu for every release.

        It’s totally cool you learned about it from Valve but that doesn’t mean people were oblivious about KDE in the 2000s and 2010s.

        • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sure, but it hasn’t been well promoted by the community or by Canonical. Otherwise I would have seen it a long time ago.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Respectfully disagree. Have been following many Ubuntu releases over the years, Ubuntu blogs and news sites, and the official flavours have always been showcased, talked about, major features discussed and so on.

            Also switching between flavours has always been trivial even post-installation. I used to test-drive KDE on Ubuntu installs and GNOME on Kubuntu installs in the 2000s and early 2010s.

            • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Do you seriously expect new users to keep up with Ubuntu blogs, news sites and stuff like that? New users don’t even know what a flavor is. New users are not that involved in the eco system. Just because you have seen it that doesn’t mean it’s widely known.

              This right here is one of the problems with old Linux users trying to recruit new users.

              • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                50 minutes ago

                In 2012 when Ubuntu was the default choice, new users were instantly told what flavours are and what the three options were and why they should choose one over another. The info was also straight on Ubuntu.com where you downloaded the install media from. The problem you’re imagining did not exist.

                E: Also I’m not trying to recruit new users therefore I’m not demonstrating my recruitment prowess. I’m having a discussion about the historical context of Ubuntu and Kubuntu/KDE. I’ve successfully converted many laymen users to Ubuntu who still use it to this day. I’ve converted whole teams to Ubuntu professionally over the years too. I know what it takes to do either.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      that’s because even people who are using ubuntu for 15 years and don’t really care that much are finally fed up and starting to look for an alternative.

      “get these security updates with ubuntu pro” is the ultimate wake-up call…

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ah yes, the 10-year corporate-grade security support for communiry packages provided for free to small users. I use it on the machines I haven’t converted to Debian yet. It’s great.

          • Baggie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Not op, but I use Ubuntu because I will need a job at some point and want to use something relatively marketable.

            Snaps are annoying, I tried to use them once for something and then have basically ignored them. They aren’t hugely core as something in windows would be.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            In my opinion Snaps are superior in terms of design and functionality than Flatpak. In practice, there are many poorly implemented snap packages. There were annoying bugs with the snap system for a long time like the update/close app notification. There’s not enough features for holding snap updates. And there isn’t built-in support for multiple repos. I like Snap but there have been legitimate problems with it (along with a lot of illegitimate ones) and the mindshare has shifted to Flatpak, which albeit inferior, fulfils most of the Snap use cases. In the end the social infrastructure is more important than the exact technology and that’s much stronger around Flatpak. I use both on Ubuntu and only Flatpak on Debian.

            If it matters, I’m a senior software guy who’s used Linux professionally for many use cases for 10-15 years. Been personally using Ubuntu since 2005. Am switching new machines to Debian because Canonical is planning to do IPO and enshittifaction would inevitably follow. Not because of Snap. 😅

            • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 hour ago

              In my opinion Snaps are superior in terms of design and functionality than Flatpak.

              You are now my enemy.

              Snaps was one of the earlier enshittification indicators, and the point where I jumped ship.

              • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                54 minutes ago

                I’ve been following Snap since it was called Click back in 2011-13 because it was solving a lot of problems that the classic, trusted package management had and still has. Problems that were elegantly solved on Android with the APK package and sandboxing system. That was pretty exciting so I might have a somewhat different perspective. :D