• smeenz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    This was “proved” in 1915, and many many times since then. The article just talks about how relativity describes how gravity affects the progression of time

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      We measured it this time…

      We knew what the measurements would show, but still, no one had done it yet.

      Not groundbreaking, not surprising, but science is ratchet is this was an incremental step that once done can be built on.

      Eventually we’re gonna have to prove all this shit anyways.

      Edit:

      The fact that it’s not stable is pretty cool too. Very small variety, but still, on a very very small scale that may matter.

      • loppy@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The authors of the original article cited by this news outlet did not measure any time on Mars in any way. They did a theoretical calculation of the time difference with Earth based on astronomical data about Mars like mass, orbit, etc.

  • Brusque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Imagine the wall peaking you could pull off on Mars, Counter Strike 7 is gonna be lit.