• 12 Posts
  • 3.48K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle


  • No Douglas Addams story ever really ends…

    Whether you read to the end of the material or quit on a random page, you’re always just getting a small glance into a much larger world where nothing is self contained and everything is connected.

    Like, dude wrote a five book trilogy, it’s obviously not a normal story structure. Even more than Tolkein, his work is about the journey and not a destination.

    So yeah, would have loved for it to keep going. But an ending of “everyone keeps going on adventures” is the norm for Addams, I don’t think there’s ever a “happily ever after” and that’s kind of why his stories have always felt so real to me.

    Same with Heinlein and other early pulp scifi writers, it was a job even if it was a passion, you always left it open ended and you always left them wanting more. Because you might need to write a sequel for next month’s rent.








  • No. I’ve no idea what could have possibly brought you to that conclusion

    Luckily it’s easy to find research from that period:

    This model requires that the tubulin is able to switch between alternative conformational states in a coherent manner, and that this process be rapid on the physiological time scale. Here, the biological feasibility of the Orch OR proposal is examined in light of recent experimental studies on microtubule assembly and dynamics. It is shown that the tubulins do not possess essential properties required for the Orch OR proposal, as originally proposed, to hold. Further, we consider also recent progress in the understanding of the long-lived coherent motions in biological systems, a feature critical to Orch OR, and show that no reformation of the proposal based on known physical paradigms could lead to quantum computing within microtubules. Hence, the Orch OR model is not a feasible explanation of the origin of consciousness.

    https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021912

    I rember that time as well, although it seems my memory is better than yours, despite you being waaaaaaay more confident.

    If you have further questions tho, ask someone else. Good luck finding someone better equiped to talk about this stuff tho. Every days another burnt bridge, right?




  • Yep

    The thing is if it’s entangled, why is there a fiber cable?

    If it’s teleportation, why is there a cable?

    However what actually makes consciousness in a brain is (hypothetically, technically) microtubules forming a very tiny cable inside of which quantum superposition is able to be maintained while we are conscious. When even brief quantum entanglement used to be insanely hard anywhere and an environment like the brain considered impossible.

    Like, it’s hard to tell what really happened from OPs article. But there should be much better articles explaining it, and this could actually end up being crazy important. Like, 20-30 years from now this might be how we finally get a real AI.

    Quick edit:

    Like, rather than one straight line to send data, if this can maintain even just entanglement in a simple fiber optic cable…

    Then that’s huge.

    If they just stretched a string between two containment chambers that each have an entangled particle, then what purpose is the string even serving?