ubergeek77's Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
NightOwl@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 24 hours ago

Trump bombs Venezuelan land for first time: Is war imminent?

www.aljazeera.com

external-link
message-square
41
fedilink
111
external-link

Trump bombs Venezuelan land for first time: Is war imminent?

www.aljazeera.com

NightOwl@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 24 hours ago
message-square
41
fedilink
US president says strike in Venezuela targeted a dock allegedly used to load boats with narcotics.
  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Except this isn’t a war, congress hasn’t declared authorized it. This headline is shit and normalizing trump going full fucking hitler.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “The Blitzkrieg of Poland wasn’t a war because the German parliament didn’t approve.”

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Sure, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine isn’t a war. It’s just a Special Military Operation, right? If we just stop calling it war, there won’t be any war! Guys, we’ve solved world peace!

      • harmbugler@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        FIFA will be so happy

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You guys are right on time. I’m proud that you can only downvote me and your arguments are crap.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Except this isn’t a war, congress hasn’t declared authorized it.

      What difference does that make?

    • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “If we don’t label it, it’s not what it is!”

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That’s not the point. He is officially a dictator by doing this.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The War Powers Act of 1973 only requires the president to notify congress within 48 hours. The president only needs authorization it troops are deployed for longer than 60 days.

          The US drone strikes wherever it feels like, whenever it feels like. In fact, this was reaffirmed in one of the wiki pages you link in another comment:

          The authorization granted the president the authority to use all “necessary and appropriate force” against those whom he determined “planned, authorized, committed or aided” the September 11 attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups.

          Note that no specific country is mentioned in that, meaning that it gave the president complete, unilateral authority to determine which countries fell into that category and how to respond.

          Business Insider has reported that the AUMF has been used to allow military deployment in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia. The 2001 AUMF has enabled the US president to unilaterally launch military operations across the world without any congressional oversight or transparency for more than two decades. Between 2018 and 2020 alone, US forces initiated what it labelled “counter-terror” activities in 85 countries. Of these, the 2001 AUMF has been used to launch classified military campaigns in at least 22 countries.

          Even now, all Trump would have to do is say he determined that Venezuela at one point “harbored” someone connected to 9/11, there could even be truth to it! If someone tangentially connected at some point might possibly have passed through Venezuela without the government’s knowledge, that’s enough (not that we would even be told the reason). This insanity became the law of the land over 20 years ago, with near-unanimous bipartisan support, and it has survived multiple democratic presidents. Biden invoked it regarding Somalia as recently as 2021.

          Welcome to the paying attention club, glad you could join us, but this is absolutely not new.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Officially? Officiated by who? Obama was also officially a dictator then?

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I think they want Trump to be aberrational and are trying to work backward from there. Just BlueMaga things.

            • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              12 hours ago

              LMAO, blue maga? Dude, you’re comment is insane. What does that even mean?

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          By that logic every president since Roosevelt was a dictator.

        • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Fair enough and my bad, I misread your comment.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I don’t think Congress has declared war since Vietnam. Everything since has been at the presidents whim and been termed a conflict, police action or some other euphemism.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Since World War II, actually.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You’re right, congress hasn’t authorized it:

        • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_1991
        • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_of_2001
        • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002
    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Captain America, things ain’t like they used to be like before you was froze.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      War is determined by actions, not by Congress.

      That being said, this isn’t war yet.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That depends on whether you are using the colloquial and international law definition, or the US formal definition. It’s only a war if Congress declares it, else it’s just a sparkling police action.

        • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Sparkling special military operation.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Congress in the US has to authorize war.

        • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_1991
        • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_of_2001
        • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002
        • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          You should be looking at the dictionary, not Wikipedia for the definition of war.

          Anyway, it’s not like Trump obeys laws anyway, so what Congress authorizes or not will probably not even come into play.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      war powers act needs to go.

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 732 users / day
  • 1.7K users / week
  • 3.13K users / month
  • 9.15K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 38.6K subscribers
  • 17.9K Posts
  • 121K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org