sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 4 days agoDoes playing audio at a high volume bluetooth wirelessly use more phone battery power than lower volume or are equidraining?message-squaremessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up199arrow-down12
arrow-up197arrow-down1message-squareDoes playing audio at a high volume bluetooth wirelessly use more phone battery power than lower volume or are equidraining?sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareAussiemandeus@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up95arrow-down1·4 days agoThe phone sends signal, that signal is sent regardless of the audio level request at the other end so the signal costs no extra energy to send. The headphones at the other end use no extra battery from reading and interpreting the signal at different volumes. But the energy required to make the speaker vibrate at higher rates takes more energy so the volume effects battery life.
minus-squarediablexical@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up38arrow-down1·3 days agoVolume would be speaker amplitude not rates.
minus-squarePlutoniumAcid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down4·3 days agoPotato, potahto. For an ELI5 it works well.
minus-squareacockworkorange@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoHigher amplitude at same frequency can only be achieved by higher rate of displacement change.
The phone sends signal, that signal is sent regardless of the audio level request at the other end so the signal costs no extra energy to send.
The headphones at the other end use no extra battery from reading and interpreting the signal at different volumes.
But the energy required to make the speaker vibrate at higher rates takes more energy so the volume effects battery life.
Volume would be speaker amplitude not rates.
Potato, potahto. For an ELI5 it works well.
Higher amplitude at same frequency can only be achieved by higher rate of displacement change.