ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoReady set godiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1739arrow-down111
arrow-up1728arrow-down1imageReady set godiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 days agoDo you not have an internal experience?
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoI don’t need to understand consciousness to be confident a llm is not conscious. Dogs are glorified barking machines. Is a tape playing a tape of a dog barking have the consciousness or intellegence of a dog?
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoProbably, their interactions with humans/dogs suggest they have a “theory of mind”. Mites? No.
minus-squareZos_Kia@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoYou can’t prove that I do, I can’t prove that you do. Those metaphysical arguments don’t have much punch in a scientific conversation.
Do you not have an internal experience?
deleted by creator
I don’t need to understand consciousness to be confident a llm is not conscious.
Dogs are glorified barking machines. Is a tape playing a tape of a dog barking have the consciousness or intellegence of a dog?
deleted by creator
Probably, their interactions with humans/dogs suggest they have a “theory of mind”.
Mites? No.
You can’t prove that I do, I can’t prove that you do. Those metaphysical arguments don’t have much punch in a scientific conversation.