• phaedrus@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems to me like there will be a split. A lot of critical thinkers that are frugal will move to Linux and up its market-share, but there will also be a lot of deals that companies make with cloud computing platforms as well for their employees instead of purchasing new laptops (which will probably also allow them to cut back on their IT staff).

    Those that are still lost when it comes to tech from 20 years ago will also buy into cloud compute platforms just because they use it at work and can’t be arsed to learn something slightly different.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I wonder how long it will take before people realize it’s cheaper to own your own hardware than lease compute time from a cloud provider? I’ve seen this same cycle with cloud VMs, I expect this will be no different.

      • phaedrus@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They won’t, ever. Not the general public, at least. Most are still perfectly content and onboard with paying for 10 different streaming services for music/movies/TV. Only immediate numbers mean anything, and $5/mo is better than $10 once, simply because 10 is larger than 5. Plus, look at all this extra shit I didn’t want that is included!

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        With cloud computing you get someone (or at least some entity) to blame when things go wrong which apparently has some value too. Also, if you don’t need a lot of resources cloud can be cheaper than setting up whole infrastructure by yourself, but that has a ton of variables. Plus with cloud there’s often option for colocation/high availability/ddos protection and other stuff around which can be pretty expensive to build yourself.

        Obviously if you try to shoehorn your current modrate sized esx/hyper-v/whatever environment to the cloud as is, that’s going to be expensive.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Obviously if you try to shoehorn your current modrate sized esx/hyper-v/whatever environment to the cloud as is, that’s going to be expensive.

          Yeah, my experience has been in the MSP space for small to medium companies. We’ve had tons of customers forego upgrading local hardware to go to a cloud provider, then have to do it in reverse a few years later when they realize they’ve already paid out the cost of their hardware and licensing agreement in hosting costs, and still have to keep paying to run the same systems.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah, this could spell the end for local installs of Microsoft office. Gdocs and o365 for everyone. Not sure if thats a win or loss.

      • phaedrus@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I see it wholly as a loss, because it advances the idea of subscriptions for anything and everything, and Microsoft will be right there on the front lines taking advantage of the new revenue stream (so losing local installs won’t hurt them at all and is what they’re going for).