Clair Obscur won multiple awards but used generative AI art as placeholders during production.
The Indie Game Awards revoked Clair Obscur’s Debut and Game of the Year after the AI disclosure.
IGAs reassigned the awards (Blue Prince, Sorry We’re Closed) and reignited debate on gen-AI use.
You know, any studio today that cares about winning the indie award as much as you seem to would probably just ask the award coordinators for clarification.
TBH this is the first time I heard about these awards 😅
My flavour of neurospicy just doesn’t understand vague rules with massive issues with how to interpret them.
So you’re perfectly fine with vague rules like that?
That would make a lot of sense.
Scientific fields obviously put a lot of effort into tackling this problem, but philosophically, it is not possible to be specific enough to do away with vagueness. At some point, you have to use language like “a reasonable person” and just leave judges to interpret the spirit of what’s being restricted.
Yes. I don’t even feel it’s that vague.