• Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    How many buyers are there is if entire archive is available for free? 10? 20?

    • noodlejetski (he/him)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      okay so this next bit might shock you, but there’s already a HUGE amount of music available on Youtube for everyone to search through and listen to with just a few click. and in addition to that, there’s the Soulseek network, countless torrent trackers – both public and private – that let you download entire discographies, as well as Youtube download tools, websites and tools that let you rip music from streaming services. and all of those are free! more than that, they have been around for years! and before that, people would download songs from Limewire or Kazaa or Napster, tape songs from radio, or buy bootleg albums. and somehow, there’s still people buying music and T-shirts from their favourite bands, and paying to attend their concerts. absolutely bonkers.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It might shock you, but content on YouTube gets paid. And illegal sources out there don’t make it more legal to share it. It’s funny though, you are basically saying what? Listen for free, middle finger to authors, and buy merchandise? As opposite to listen legally, authors get something and buy merchandise? But hey, I’m glad that you speak for authors.

        • noodlejetski (he/him)@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          It might shock you, but content on YouTube gets paid

          similar fraction of pennies as in Spotify’s case, and often the people who receive the money aren’t the people behind the content, especially when it comes to older or less popular music, because it’s been uploaded by some random guy 14 years ago.

          you are basically saying what? Listen for free, middle finger to authors, and buy merchandise? As opposite to listen legally, authors get something and buy merchandise?

          no, my good guy, I say middle finger to Spotify and their warmongering, slop-embracing, Joe-Rogan-loving business, and spend money in a way that skips at least one middle man which hopefully results in the artist getting a bigger cut, and in you actually owning something even when the company you’ve bought from goes down, rather than renting it.

          But hey, I’m glad that you speak for authors.

          right back atcha!

          • Mihies@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            right back atcha!

            How so? You are the wiser what artists really wants - not being paid for listening to their music and would like you to listen to it for free. I merely follow what they offer and not trying to listen to it illegally.