• noodlejetski (he/him)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It might shock you, but content on YouTube gets paid

    similar fraction of pennies as in Spotify’s case, and often the people who receive the money aren’t the people behind the content, especially when it comes to older or less popular music, because it’s been uploaded by some random guy 14 years ago.

    you are basically saying what? Listen for free, middle finger to authors, and buy merchandise? As opposite to listen legally, authors get something and buy merchandise?

    no, my good guy, I say middle finger to Spotify and their warmongering, slop-embracing, Joe-Rogan-loving business, and spend money in a way that skips at least one middle man which hopefully results in the artist getting a bigger cut, and in you actually owning something even when the company you’ve bought from goes down, rather than renting it.

    But hey, I’m glad that you speak for authors.

    right back atcha!

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      right back atcha!

      How so? You are the wiser what artists really wants - not being paid for listening to their music and would like you to listen to it for free. I merely follow what they offer and not trying to listen to it illegally.