• Devial@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 天前

    Insurance is to cover the costs of the OTHER person if you cause an accident, so fucking yeah.

    If you get in a car, that has the potential to cost someone else tens of thousands of dollars if you fuck up, you better fucking have some way in place to compensate that person, in case you do fuck up.

    It’s your choice if you use insurance or capital for that, but it’s unfair to OTHER people on the road if they have to end up sitting up on (tens of) thosuands of dollars because you fucked up, and don’t have any way to compensate them.

    And getting rid of insurance is not the solution to bad public transit access, and mandatory auto liability insurance isn’t a bad thing just because shit public transit forces most people into cars.

    Like what alternative do you suggest ? No mandatory insurance, and crash victims just have to send up sitting on their own repair and medical costs, and that’s somehow better ?

    I feel like ending up sitting on the costs of a crash you didn’t even cause is going to be more harmful to low income people than having to fork over liability insurance payments.

    • Starski@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      My suggestion is a government based insurance system that everyone puts a proportional amount into based on their wages, almost like taxes one might say, that goes towards a publicly available fund for people that have traumatic accidents/injuries.