• Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    With the projected population decline, the inflationary effects of creating money in order to pay pensions could actually be beneficial

    • turdas@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I imagine you’re not being entirely serious, but I fail to see how that is anything but yet another inventive way of kicking the can down the road so that boomers don’t have to deal with it.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So it’s honestly something I’ve been noodling about for a while, which is how to manage a soft landing from the current capitalist system given the overall trend of population decline and how capitalism as it’s currently structured can’t handle a sustained decline like we’ll eventually be looking at.

        The best vision I can come up with (and this is US-centric since it’s what I know best of course) is to first expand Medicare to all, next expand SNAP/Foodstamps benefits to all, then expand the housing assistance programs to all. Somewhere in there a universal pension and later on a universal income. This would decouple working class folks’ everyday and long-term needs from the wider economy. Basically eliminate the micro-economy so that the macroeconomy can do whatever it will do without too much pain for everyday people

        • turdas@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          That makes more sense. I was thinking printing money only to pay pensions, which honestly seems like something European social democrat parties might actually do.