• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m not seeing where any of this gives Google permission to train AI using your data. As far as I can see it’s all about using AI to manage your data, which is a completely different thing. The word “training” appears to originate in Dave Jones’ tweet, not in any of the Google pages being quoted. Is there any confirmation that this is actually happening, and not just a social media panic?

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The only option is smart features, on or off. That requires Google to read the email to categorize them and do a lot of basic stuff. It doesn’t let you narrowly have more privacy on specific features. It’s all or nothing, and if you get a lot of emails then it’s hard to turn it off if you already use categories. Google always does all or nothing because they know people need some of it, same with location. It has to be precise location tracking to use things, you can’t just do rough location.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Understand that basically ANYTHING that “uses AI” is using you for training data.

      At its simplest, it is the old fashioned A/B testing where you are used as part of a reinforcement/labeling pipeline. Sometimes it gets considerably more bullshit as your very queries and what would make you make them are used to “give you a better experience” and so forth.

      And if you read any of the EULAs (for the stuff that google opted users into…) you’ll see verbiage along those lines.

      Of course, the reality is that google is going to train off our data regardless. But that is why it is a good idea to decouple your life from google as much as possible. It takes a long ass time but… no better time than today.