I guess one thing I like already is that there’s no requirements for Karma, stupid rules about Reddit’s filters which got my 100k karma account permanently banned for no reason at all.

Would you prefer Lemmy to be smaller like it is now or get to a reddit level popularity but without the reddit jank.

    • IonTempted@lemmynsfw.comOP
      3·
      2 days ago

      I’m of the opinion that as large as this community gets (or any community) it’s bound to have many characters.

      I guess I don’t mind that much because I think A) You won’t ever have a large site where everyone 100% agrees with you all the way, unless you are on a specific political community and even then I’ve seen many infights and civil wars over small issues.

      B) I’ve dealt with many of them in worse sites (Yes even 4chan) that I don’t mind them anymore, as long as they contribute in their own communities and don’t cause harm for the website then they can chirp on their communities as much as they want, I was the kind of guy that enjoyed Political Compass memes on reddit even though it got ruined by Right-Wingers now, I was on that subreddit long before though and as soon as literal Nazis joined the subreddit got worse.

      C) We should absolutely have rules to ban people that post innapropriate, illegal stuff but I feel like this website should be easier than Reddit on the moderating stuff, I’m 100% on banning Nazis and fascists if they make the site worse for everyone else, though I happened to have some interesting conversations with some Conservatives. Reddit on a whole has an awful moderating system that ironically enough doesn’t ever get checked by human beings and I don’t want to see the same here, I’ve heard people that got banned because they had the mental health crisis bot even though they didn’t do anything, I’ve heard people got banned for similar ways that I did for posting a meme lol.

      Take of this what you will.

    • Blizzard@lemmy.zipEnglish
      53·
      2 days ago

      There are literally openly communist communities on Lemmy… 🤦🏻‍♂️

            • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
              1·
              12 hours ago

              The more I read about state capitalism, the vaguer it seems.

              an economic system where the government plays a central role by managing key industries and manipulating market outcomes

              is the most coherent definition I can find. Examples

              • the centrally planned, command economy of the USSR with wage labor
              • the liberalized market economy of the PRC with some large state industries, a strong private sector, foreign investment, market-based trade
              • the Norwegian economy with state ownership of the oil industry & some companies and ownership stake in large, publicly traded companies
              • United States with its publicly funded bailouts & recent state ownership stake in some publicly traded companies.

              Some economists argued it’s merely state socialism & planned economy relabeled.

              Whatever it is, communist states like USSR & China have long claimed they’re transitional.

              Communism is by definition a stateless, classless society.

              No, that’s a communist society, a purely unsubstantiated, speculative, moneyless, post-scarcity utopia that has never once been realized & probably never will. Belongs in the realm of mythology.

              Communism is the ideology whose goal is the creation of a communist society. Much like Christianity with the 2nd coming of Christ, adherents insist it’ll happen someday inevitably. No possible way their great prophet Marx was wrong.

              A communist state (also known as a Marxist–Leninist state) is a government consisting of a socialist state following Marxist–Leninist political philosophy with a dictatorial ruling class that promises to achieve a communist society. Unfortunately, while belief systems like Judaism had the sense to warn adherents against trying to force their dream utopia prematurely, Marx lacked such sense to urge the crazies against it.

              Regardless, the overzealous failures here are some strain of communist: they follow the ideology.

                • MolochAlter@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  11·
                  20 hours ago

                  You’re appealing to definitions as if they matter in real world contexts.

                  If I created a group called “the bad people killers” and started killing people would that “by definition” mean everyone I killed was bad?

                  Communism may be defined as a wheelbarrow full of monkeys for all that matters, in the real world every self-sufficient communist regime was a shitshow of state capitalism, coercion, censorship, and state violence. All the drawbacks of capitalism and none of the perks.

                  That’s what communism, descriptively, is. The day you figure out a way to manifest reality by sheer will alone without having to deal with the real world I will be interested in what something is “by definition”

                  • 鳳凰院 凶真 (Hououin Kyouma)@sh.itjust.works
                    1·
                    20 hours ago

                    Communism may be defined as a wheelbarrow full of monkeys for all that matters, in the real world every self-sufficient communist regime was a shitshow of state capitalism, coercion, censorship, and state violence. All the drawbacks of capitalism and none of the perks.

                    I mean, fair point. I do agree with the fact thay “communism” in practice has practically always been a shitshow.