• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Let’s make a deal. We cancel SNAP and implement a Negative Income Tax as conservative economist Milton Friedman recommended. That brings everyone up to the poverty line, and everyone on SNAP today won’t need it anymore.

    Benefits for you:

    • close a bunch of SNAP jobs
    • retail stores don’t need to remember what’s snap approved and what’s not

    Benefits for everyone else:

    • no more poverty
    • no application process for benefits, just file a fax return
    • cash instead of food-specific benefits, so people with food can use the cash for something else they need (clothes, utilities, etc)
    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, poverty’s expensive for everybody.

      Much as I’m loathed to ever agree with an economist (conservative or otherwise), the general thrust there’s sound.

      Let the currency (and energy) flow. For the good of all, the prosperity of all. Even the rich are better off.

      • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        The rich are better off is a weird saying. Who is better off a billionaire with $1 billion or a billionaire with 10 billion? They are the same, nobody can spend a billion in their lifetime. These people build $500 million mega yatchs because they have nothing better to do with their money.