• ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Who knows, maybe Autodesk will finally start thinking about Linux.
    They already use Qt anyway, so the .NET part is all they’d need to fix.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      There’s Mono. I don’t know what portion of .NET compatibility issues that addresses in 2025.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Well of course, there’s probably other Windows stuff they are also using, considering how much they aren’t even trying to ship for something like Ubuntu, which would be super easy otherwise.

        I can only imagine how big of a push Autodesk can easily put towards Linux. That would easily make the current rise to 5% be nothing in comparison. Maybe MS is paying them too, to keep them together.
        Of course it might also just be that MS makes it easier for them to setup a DRM (Digital Rights Management) as compared to Linux, not that it matters considering how much they have been pirated.


        Then there was this person who was not using Linux because of the CAD software he wanted to use and when I asked what exactly it was, he said, “KiCad”[1].


        1. it’s available in Arch and Debian official repositories ↩︎

          • ulterno@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah, so you see, they just don’t know that the stuff is available.
            They are also the types to download from stuff like Softonic/MegaUpload etc. when the official website has downloads available, so even if the website were to advertise Linux availability, they would never end up seeing it.