I’m currently using LibreWolf (a Firefox fork) as my primary browser, with uBlock Origin set to block scripts by default on all but a few sites. When i need to use a site that’s not one of these trusted ones and refuses to work without JS (for example, forums.linuxmint.com), is it better for my privacy to temporarily allow JS or to open the site in a different browser like FF or Vivaldi?

Does switching browsers actually make it harder to track me, especially ones that don’t have full modern CSS and JS support like Dillo, Links2, Alhena, and NetSurf?

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Aprivate tab protect nothing, it only prevents that other with access to your PC see which pages you have visited, the web pages see the same with or without privat tab. It’s often misunderstood what private browsing mean. If you want to browse private, there isn’t any other as using an Proxy or VPN, using Portmaster, Glasswire or Pi-Hole on desktop, adjust the site permissions in the privacy settings in your browser, than you can browse more or less private, if you also use an search engine which don’t log your activity. You can visit Browserleaks, there you can see how private you are.

    • Grey Cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      His main point wasn’t private tabs, it was firefox containers. He only mentioned private tabs for deleteting cookies after closing those tabs.

      Temporary Containers was really good for that, but it hasn’t been updated in years.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Private browsing also gives you a seperate cookie store. In 2025, this probably isn’t enough- but websites do not “see just like without private browsing”