• Yeather@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Well let’s break your points down.

    1: The president does not need to pretend everything is done in the name of god. One party does this to appeal to a religious base.

    2: You do not need to swear into office on a bible, many have sworn in on nothing at all or other holy books.

    3: Every hotel is provided a bible (and often a book of mormon) by that company. This is because the company many of these hotels are owned by is a mormon company. Many hotels do not have bibles in them now.

    4: Children are not required to pray in the morning, unless you attend a religious school specifically. If you mean the pledge, that is also optional and not done in many schools.

    5: In God We Trust is an odd case yes. It was added in the 1950’s to “combat socialism.”

    6: Churches are not required to pay taxes because they are also charities that perform good acts for the poor. Other religions claim this benefit as well.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Trump is a religion here. His devout call themselves christian but its clearly distinct in both beliefs and rituals.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago
      1. Actually they all functionally do, just to varying extents. Good luck finding a President who has never mentioned God in any of their speeches.

      2. Technically correct, but those who choose Not A Bible are routinely targetted with bigoted smear campaigns, often death threats, many of them credible, actionable.

      3. I mean you just do admit that this happens, that’s how normalized religion is, the state doesn’t do anything and it just happens.

      4. Clearly you have no idea how widespread and common it is for parents to force their kids to do this, for teachers in more religious states to force the pledge. Actual rules on the book be damned, don’t follow the unwritten ones and you are a pariah.

      5. You again concede this is the case.

      6. Churches can perform charitable acts, but there is no requirement for this, many of them don’t, many of them either directly or indirectly donate money to political think tank/campaigns and call that ‘charity’, many of them explicitly endorse particular political candidates, despite that being illegal, because either no one reports the violation and/or nobody bothers to prosecute it.

      See also: The entire megachurch/megapastor phenomenon in the US, which would be described as a massive cult in basically any other country.

      • Yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago
        1. Because they are religious? You would be hard pressed to find politicians who do not appeal to a higher authority except in countries where religious freedoms are restricted.

        2. Targeted by smear campaigns from their political opponents who would have smear campaigns running anyways. Credible death threats is a different story and not the norm, politicians recieve death threats from wackos over everything they do.

        3. What would the state do? It’s a first amendment protected right. If you dislike this practice you can stay in hotels without bibles.

        4. Anecdotal evidence at best, maybe in the more religious areas of the country in the south this happens, but they are a minority.

        5. Good job realizing that.

        6. Yes megachurches do provide some charity to maintain their tax exempt status. There is no defined percentage of revenue you must spend to be a charity. This is a larger issue that affects secular charities as well.

        You have really only argued one of your six points.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You seem to arguing the US is not literally an official theocracy.

          I am arguing that religiosity in the US is significantly more pervasive, common and extreme than in any other developed country, and I don’t even need to argue this, all kinds of stats have borne this out in detail, for decades.

          Almost half of the US believes that we are all living in ‘the end times’, that the Rapture will either happen in their lifetimes, or even very, very soon.

          Thats almost half the US that literally exists in an apocalyptic death cult.

          They wouldn’t call it that, but that is literally what it is. Most other Christians in most other parts of the world do not believe in this essentially uniquely American fan fiction version of Christianity… and most Americans don’t even know that, that everyone else thinks we are weird.

          Its a huge reason why we also statistically abberantly don’t believe climate change is real or is caused by humans or should have something done about it.

          Its also a huge reason that US Evangelicals, up untill extremely recently… basically uniformly support anything Israel does.

          They largely hate Jews, but, they literally want to hasten the apocalpyse, to hit all the conditions that they ‘interpreted’ into their scenario for the preamble to the Rapture.

          • Yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Thomas Jefferson was a Deist, which is about as close to atheism as you could get since atheism was not “founded” in its modern forms yet.