• magguzu@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How long until AI models start training off Grokipedia, and we have the biggest game of hallucination telephone?

  • tino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Anybody going there to test “how bad it is” is giving them traffic, which they can use to brag about its success. Personally, I’d rather completely ignore it and disregard whoever mention it one day as a source, which will never happen hopefuly.

  • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The first thing I noticed about grokipedia is that it doesn’t do a good job at qualifying the strength of sources.

  • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s been fun watching Elon go from space Jesus to shorthand for any billionaire vanity project that will amount to nothing.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Anyone who knew much about space knew that was nonsense from the start, as colonizing a subantarctic volcano is literally more practical than colonizing Mars.

      And that’s assuming paradigm shifts in spaceflight. Turns out, they did not materialize at all. With SABRE air-breathing engines and Virgin-style stratolaunches dead, things actually went way worse than I expected years ago.

      Don’t get me wrong. SpaceX is great, Starship is cool, research in space is awesome. But ever since I’ve first read Musk’s public thoughts, he struck me as ‘not scientifically grounded,’ and I wondered how that incongruity would shake out.


      TL;DR: Truth never mattered, and it still doesn’t :(

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      All cars can catch fire, some more often, others more intensely. Doesn’t matter if it’s a swastikar or not.

      Instead of pitting EVs against ICE, let’s all push to reduce car dependence and instead encourage the development of public transit!

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    All he has to do is force it in front of people’s eyes instead of Wikipedia. It doesn’t actually have to be useful, just in the way.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If it doesn’t do anything useful, I don’t think any amount of shoving in front of people is going to amount to much uptake beyond some cursory fiddling to determine its uselessness.

      People hand out flyers to every passerby too, and nearly all of those end up in the nearest trash bin.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ultimately, this could highlight the incredibly high value of wikipedia as a common ressource, and might lead to better things there.

    Maybe.

  • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    He also gave the example of a German Wiki community member who wrote a program to verify the ISBN numbers of books cited, and was able to trace notable mistakes to one person. That person ultimately confessed they had used ChatGPT to find citations for text references and the LLM “just very happily makes up books for you,” Wales said.

    Well this won’t be a problem with Grokipedia, because it only uses sources that are available online as pure text (I’m pretty sure not even PDFs are used by it).

    Wales thinks the public and the media often give Wikipedia too much credit. In its early days, he says, the site was never as bad as the jokes made about it. But now, he says, “We are not as good as they think we are. Of course, we are a lot better than we used to be, but there is still so much work to do.”

    Amen, it’s nice to see the level-headedness.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      One key difference: Conservapedia was young earth creationist, Grok is not. That amount of difference unfortunately enough to convince a lot of average Joes of credibility.

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Let’s hope this time it’ll be like that, and not like Gamergate, when far-right conservatives convinced a generation worth of gamers that they’re not for-censorship, because they missed the times of calling blacks the N-word.

      • odelik@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Effect vs affect: Use ‘impact’ instead of having to worry about two words that essentially mean the same thing but are context based.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not to sure about the latter part.

      Elmo will be bankrupt in not too much time but for the moment he has pockets so deep he single handedly could fund wikipedia for the next millenia. For as long as he isn’t bankrupt and alive, that turd will be around

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not really.

      Remember that Elmo just lies his ass off almost all the time.

      Over promises and under delivery are such extreme understatements with him, almost everything bhe says is just pure imaginary bullshit

      Lying his ass off literally is the only thing he does well, it made Tesla stocks balloon to being overvalued somewhere in 10-100 times their actual value

      Remember hyperloop, that project that even high schoolers could identify as absolutely dumb? Billions and billions in investment money has been wasted on absolute bullshit that will never work.

      But what about SpaceX, I hear you type?

      Remember how we’d land on Mars in 2018, now 7-8 years ago? Yeah, Elmo is currently at about 1% of that particular promise. Again, it’s not under delivery, it’s just actual plain bullshit

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Hyperloop, Neuralink, Tesla Semi, FSD, Mars lander, Roadster, Boring company…But we sent Elizabeth Holmes to jail.

      • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Speaking of SpaceX, ISRO was able to come up with a design of a Reusable-launch vehicle in half the price & did it way before them