• AceBonobo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 days ago

    Multi frame generation is such a garbage feature. Intel would get more value shaming nvidia than from developing their own.

  • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    Wait, what puts it ahead of AMD? FSR4 is damn good and works on the 6k series and up.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      Wait, what puts it ahead of AMD?

      So far nothing. The article doesn’t link to XeSS 3 because that thing doesn’t seem to be released.

      • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah… That’s what I thought… No benchmarks etc. Still competition is good but yeah FSR RS is still due soon.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    I personally don’t count multi-frame generation. That’s not just adding (fake) frames, but also real latency. I don’t care if you like it or not. People who don’t know what they are doing think this gives them more frames per second.