• meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Is it? I always thought lower life expectancies were dragged down by infant mortality. Basically if you survive the crib you’d likely live into your 70s.

    • snooggums@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      When referring to diseases, yeah, but there was also a lot of death from wars and other violence, severe injuries from dangerous labor, and labor was pretty risky. If one was healthy and avoided injury they were certainly on par with modern life spans.

    • boatswain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, that’s what my dad says, and he’s a medieval historian, so I believe him. I guess it’s possible that lifespan in 1901 was much shorter than the middle ages, but that seems unlikely