I know not every superhero story is the same, but I feel like recent superhero media has moved away from showing heroes actually saving people. Even vigilantes like Batman and Daredevil rescue civilians—they’re not just crime fighters. Superheroes may not be realistic, but they’ve always prioritized saving lives.

That’s one reason I like The Flash on the CW—it balanced both saving people and crime fighting, even if the crime-fighting usually came first. Superman & Lois does this even better. Almost every episode shows Superman stopping disasters or accidents, not just punching villains.

Superheroes aren’t just super-powered cops, soldiers, or secret agents. They should also be part-time super-firefighters. Shows like 9-1-1 and Chicago Fire make me wish we had more of those rescue scenes—but with superheroes. Not every episode has to be about saving the whole city.

  • √𝛂𝛋𝛆@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Nearly all stories told are reflective of the propaganda culture of the era. Justifying the cult of billionaire exceptionalism has been the theme for a long time.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yes! I see it in horror movies most clearly, a mirror to our fears, at least after the fact.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      At least Batman and iron man fit the description. What about the others then? I can’t think of many superheroes who happen to be wealthy.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If they’re not wealthy it’s usually individuals that are in some way special and exceptional because they have a power by birth, accident or because of a rare doohickey.

        • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Hmm. So that’s where the exceptionalism argument comes from. Kinda makes sense too, since you have to be exceptional to have exceptional powers. Can’t really make a movie about usual people having exceptional powers, now can you. Like, the whole point of the movie is to look at the life of someone who has strange powers, and getting to that point has to be somehow really weird.

          • lastweakness@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Yeah OC’s argument seems very shallow to me. Where does spider-man even fall in all this? The typical spidey depiction is a broke kid who isn’t even sure he wants to be a superhero. What does that make him?

            • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Well his personality and background aren’t anything compared to many other superheroes. The circumstances of gaining the powers is the only really exceptional thing about him. Other than that, he seems like a pretty average kid to me.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Funny. Now you got me thinking. In real life, I wouldn’t be rooting for an eccentric Billionaire who thinks he’s a superhero, but when I compare the guy with no super powers to Mr. “I can pretty much do whatever I want and I’m practically indestructible” he feels like an underdog and a whole lot cooler.