• ulkesh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes, it is a batshit crazy statement. “Fad - noun - an intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something, especially one that is short-lived and without basis in the object’s qualities; a craze”. OOP has existed for 40 years, has been widely tested, is a proven form of programming, and is still in active use today. You’re clearly missing the point, are severely uninformed, or have some agenda here, and I don’t really care to argue it with you. Good day.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re focusing too much on the ‘short lived’ part and not enough on the ‘intense’ and ‘without basis in qualities’ parts.

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Short-lived is a key attribute of what “fad” means. If something stupid catches on for decades, it’s not a fad.

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, the definition says ‘especially one that is short-lived’. It means that things that are not short-lived can still be fads. It’s clearly an optional attribute. The key attributes are ‘intense’, ‘widely shared’.

          • blackbrook@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Well, it depends what dictionary you consult. Can you give an example of a long-lived thing that would be widely considered a fad?

            There are fads that have persisted over a longer term by coming in and out of fashion, like say bell-bottom pants. But I can’t think of something that would be widely considered a fad that has stayed in fashion for decades.