• ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re focusing too much on the ‘short lived’ part and not enough on the ‘intense’ and ‘without basis in qualities’ parts.

    • blackbrook@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Short-lived is a key attribute of what “fad” means. If something stupid catches on for decades, it’s not a fad.

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, the definition says ‘especially one that is short-lived’. It means that things that are not short-lived can still be fads. It’s clearly an optional attribute. The key attributes are ‘intense’, ‘widely shared’.

        • blackbrook@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, it depends what dictionary you consult. Can you give an example of a long-lived thing that would be widely considered a fad?

          There are fads that have persisted over a longer term by coming in and out of fashion, like say bell-bottom pants. But I can’t think of something that would be widely considered a fad that has stayed in fashion for decades.