We’ve mistaken complexity for progress — and forgotten how things work. A 41-year-old computer still boots instantly, while today’s “smart” tech buckles.
Most importantly, we need to stop mistaking novelty for innovation and complexity for progress.
Innovation isn’t just creating new features or functionality. In fact, most I’d argue is taking existing features or functions and delivering them for substantially less cost/effort.
I’m…not quite understanding you reply. I think you’re trying to add on “results” to my statement of “cost/effort”, but I covered “results” with my first statement of “features or functionality”. So if I understand your post properly, I think your addition is simply duplicative of what I already included.
Have I misunderstood what you’re trying to communicate?
… /results.
I’m…not quite understanding you reply. I think you’re trying to add on “results” to my statement of “cost/effort”, but I covered “results” with my first statement of “features or functionality”. So if I understand your post properly, I think your addition is simply duplicative of what I already included.
Have I misunderstood what you’re trying to communicate?