Trump is probably on the list, so he has to protect that. The Democrats had it during their entire presidency; even if they didn’t want turmoil during their time in office, they could have released it after their presidential defeat and before Trump took office.

  • PussButton@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Probably because there is no actual list. And what would that ‘list’ actually mean?

      • PussButton@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well yes. Why would you come to another conclusion, one that’s not based on some conspiracy theory?

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          How do you know? It would be quite odd for there to be zero paper trails from running a child sex trafficking ring of this size. Its absurd to claim that there is no evidence of it.

          • PussButton@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yet there’s not actual any evidence supporting the claim that there’s a child sex trafficking ring going on. Or was going on. Which is weird for the scale it supposedly was. That’s what’s absurd.