• FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Assembly is very simple (at least RISC-V assembly is which I mostly work with) but also very tedious to read. It doesn’t help that the people who choose the instruction mnemonics have extremely poor taste - e.g. lb, lh, lw, ld instead of load8, load16, load32, load64. Or j instead of jump. Who needs to save characters that much?

    The over-abbreviation is some kind of weird flaw that hardware guys all have. I wondered if it comes from labelling pins on PCB silkscreens (MISO, CLK etc)… Or maybe they just have bad taste.

    I once worked on a chip that had nested acronyms.

    • amorpheus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Who needs to save characters that much?

      Do you realize how old assembly language is?

      It predates hard disks by ten years and coincided with the invention of the transistor.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Do you realize how old assembly language is?

        Do you? These instructions were created in 2011.

        It predates hard disks by ten years and coincided with the invention of the transistor.

        I’m not sure what the very first assembly language has to do with RISC-V assembly?

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The over-abbreviation is some kind of weird flaw that hardware guys all have

      My bet is on the teaching methods in uni. From what I’ve seen, older teaching methods use terrible variable names for a production environment. I think it unfortunately sticks because students get used to it and find it easier & faster than typing things out.