The scariest part of this recent news is that TM Signal seem(ed) to be interoperable. People using TM Signal could interact with actual Signal users. How are you to know whether or not your groups have people using bastardized versions of Signal? Are things like Session interoperable with Signal?

  • root@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes of course. Signal can archive messages and they can be restored, you can screenshot messages and you can have them backed up as part of a policy like icloud backups.

    My question is more about how do you know you’re interacting with an authentic signal client, and not a bastardized one.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      how do you know you’re interacting with an authentic signal client, and not a bastardized one.

      I don’t think that’s the point… it does not matter. Even if it’s an authentic client, if the device (e.g. 0 day vulnerability on the OS) or the user (e.g. does not lock their phone while going to the bathroom) is compromised, your conversation is not secure.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      At the moment you can’t. The only realistic way I could see that happening is if the servers would check the app’s digital signature and refuse the app from communicating with the official infrastructure if it didn’t match.

        • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s the point of digitally signing the app, to ensure its authenticity and integrity. TM and others wouldn’t be able to resign the modified app with the Signal Foundation signature.

          EDIT: Yeah after thinking more about it it’s not a trivial problem, as you need to assume that the endpoint is inherently untrusted.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Not to mention that a device that would pass Play Integrity is precisely the device I wouldn’t ever consider doing anything private on. Which would defeat the whole point of Signal. It’s already bad enough that it’s so desktop-unfriendly while much fewer phones than computers that can run non-privacy-invasive OSes than computers…

            • utopiah@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Isn’t that just delegating trust to a third party, e.g. here Google? It’s not as if Google was somehow immune to 0 days.