Possibly linux@lemmy.zip to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-28 个月前The Pentagon is the best shape for a large buildings as long as all surrounding buildings are also Pentagonsmessage-squaremessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up132arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up114arrow-down1message-squareThe Pentagon is the best shape for a large buildings as long as all surrounding buildings are also PentagonsPossibly linux@lemmy.zip to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-28 个月前message-square24fedilinkfile-text
Who needs straight roads anyway. We would have 3 way intersections instead plus the wind would have less of a impact
minus-squareTranquilTurbulence@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 个月前What do you intend to do with the gaps then?
minus-squareTranquilTurbulence@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-28 个月前Yeah, that should work. If you stick with the definition provided by OP, “small buildings” would be technically allowed as well. If the gasp are a problem, you could go with alternate pentagons too. Another thing about the initial conditions. OP defined that there would be only three way intersections, but that’s clearly not the case here.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 个月前Parks are in the middle, Roman domus style.
What do you intend to do with the gaps then?
Room for parks!
Yeah, that should work. If you stick with the definition provided by OP, “small buildings” would be technically allowed as well.
If the gasp are a problem, you could go with alternate pentagons too.
Another thing about the initial conditions. OP defined that there would be only three way intersections, but that’s clearly not the case here.
Parks are in the middle, Roman domus style.