• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They both shoot rockets up in the sky. Our government could pay NASA to do it, or pay Space X.

    • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      NASA does not build it’s own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.

      Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Uh, basically no.

          NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn’t really make a lot of sense.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I mean, that’s always been the case. That’s literally spaceX’s primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It’s the same for every launch provider in the US.

        • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.

          NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn’t want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay