General_Effort@lemmy.world to

News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months ago

The huge stakes in a new Supreme Court case about pornography

151

The huge stakes in a new Supreme Court case about pornography

General_Effort@lemmy.world to

News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months ago

Texas asks the justices to abandon longstanding First Amendment protections for sexual speech.

Chat

solsangraal@lemmy.zip
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
107
arrow-down
2·
edit-2
7 days ago
deleted by creator
- Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
  link
  fedilink
  arrow-up
  40·
  9 months ago
  They’re doing this to try to define queerness as porn and queer people as sexual abusers.
  
  Florida already tried to make it punishable by death
  - captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6·
    9 months ago
    Exactly, they’re attempting to establish legal pretext for genocide
- hemmes@lemmy.world
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  15
  arrow-down
  1·
  9 months ago
  Because Jesus Christ is watching me while I do it!!! 😭😭😭😭😭😭
  - Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16·
    9 months ago
    That fucking perv!
    - RedCarCastle@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8·
      9 months ago
      Jokes on him thats my kink haha

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

2.51K users / day
4.17K users / week
3.99K users / month
244 users / 6 months
0 local subscribers
24.6K subscribers
10.2K Posts
211K Comments
Modlog