• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I have one of those at work now, but my experience with it is still quite limited. With Copilot it was quite useful for knocking up quick boutique solutions for particular problems (stitch together a load of PDFs sorted on a name heading), with the proviso that you might end up having to repair bleed between dependency versions and repair syntax. I couldn’t trust it with big refactors of existing systems.

    • brie@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Cursor and Claude are a lot better than Copilot, but none of them can be trusted. For existing large code repos, LLMs can generate tests and similar boring stuff. I suspect there’ll be an even bigger shift to micro services to make it easier for LLMs generate something that works.