• hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not a picture though. It’s a link to a picture on a server somewhere. If the host goes down, you own nothing.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Isn’t it just a small amount of data? If the picture is small enough you could put it directly on the blockchain.

      Dunno why you would though. It’s very limiting for no particular gain.

      • ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels

    • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The technology behind it can be used for things other than pictures. That’s kind of the point people are making

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing