GIMP - Development Update: Closing In on the 3.0 Release Candidate
www.gimp.org
Update on 3.0 RC1 Development

GIMP 3.0 is over 96% complete! The GIMP team got sick at the Libre Arts conference over the summer, hence the setback to the release schedule but they are now back making good progress.

Along with non-destructive editing and a colour overhaul we’ve all been waiting for, longstanding critics of the UI/UX will be pleased to hear that GIMP are setting up a UX repository and are looking to build a dedicated team of designers to develop this.

All of these things look set to make the GIMP project feel a lot more current and dynamic. I can’t wait!

And if anyone wants to help out it looks like testing/reporting, donations and updating the help manual are all welcomed by the project at the moment.

  • refalo@programming.dev
    33·
    1 month ago

    For professionals used to Photoshop, yes it is that bad. People want what’s familiar because they’re used to it and they’re busy or lazy. They don’t want to learn something new.

    If GIMP wanted to increase their userbase by a million overnight, they would make it look more like Photoshop.

    The problem is they and many current users are huge FOSS zealots and see this kind of thing akin to selling your soul to the devil.

    • Disonantezko@lemmy.sdf.org
      2·
      10 days ago

      To me Adobe has very bad UI, I did try to use it, and first time was awful. Freehand was a lot more intuitive, but when Macromedia was bought, was killed.

      I get it, that a lot of people did learn to use Adobe UI, and of course they want the same because they’re used to, but doesn’t make it better.

      Affinity is more friendlier than PS to me.

      I’m not saying that GIMP UI is perfect or good, but right now, to my casual use case, is not bad. Obviously can be better, and get some ideas from other UIs.