• capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    What country do you live in? I’m curious which one has no theft or violent crime.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Not OP check out my username for an idea of where I live. Besides a bit of gang on gang action in our capital, violent crimes are extremely rare. It’s maybe once a year that police have to shoot at a person, and even then police officers will assess the situation and if possible not go for center mass.

      Note how I left out theft. That’s because you can’t directly use violence to protect property.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Note how I left out theft. That’s because you can’t directly use violence to protect property.

        I remember hearing this when I lived in the UK for a few years and I was blown away. What are you expected to do if being robbed? Let it happen?

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah, not here.

            I’ve had shit stolen. The police “handled it” to an extent but we will never get back priceless family heirlooms given to us from my wife’s side of the family. Fuck thieves.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Did you not have a gun at the time? Or did your ownership of a gun not prevent the theft?

                  • capital@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    36 minutes ago

                    I honestly can’t tell if this is sarcasm or if you have reading comprehension problems.

                    I wasn’t home. There was no possibility for me to prevent this theft, gun or no gun.

                    If it’s sarcasm meant to show that things can happen even when armed, no shit. If that is meant to show I shouldn’t have one at all, would the counterfactual (situations in which a theft or assault were stopped or prevented) be sufficient to show one should carry?

            • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Agreed thieves are terrible.

              Not many better options if you are getting robbed though.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Call the police. Are you in physical danger? If not why are you putting yourself in physical danger?

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I don’t think I understand your question.

            What scenario are you imagining with these questions?

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There’s a difference between “violent crime exists” and “violent crime is so prevalent that regular citizens need to carry around an implement designed to kill people quickly while they go about their daily lives.”

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          49 minutes ago

          “Wearing a seatbelt is the same as walking around with a device that can near instantly kill people.” Is something said by someone living in a dystopia.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            39 minutes ago

            It was a preparedness analogy which seems to have gone over your head.

            Is something said by someone living in a dystopia.

            You’ve had a variation on this in just about every response. It’s getting very old. We get it, US bad.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 minutes ago

              Was my statement wrong in any way?

              If it’s getting old stop trying to argue against it by saying the dystopian attitude is necessary.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 minutes ago

                Was my statement wrong in any way?

                Do you know how analogies work? Of course the two things I compared are different.

                It’s like if I said “a fish swimming is like a bird flying” and you coming along and saying “omg swimming and flying are the same now???/”

                I even spelled it out - it’s about preparedness.