Group A: “I am intolerant of (group) because they need to go back to their own country and not live in mine.”
Group B: “I am intolerant of (group) because they don’t tolerate other ethnicities.”
This guy: “but who was intolerant first?”
Group A: “I am intolerant of (group) because they need to go back to their own country and not live in mine.”
Group B: “I am intolerant of (group) because they don’t tolerate other ethnicities.”
This guy: “but who was intolerant first?”


tl, dw. When did the discussion start?


So he’s going to rehire the visa dependent labourers RG fired?
That’s neither a statement nor an argument, and is complete nonsense.


That’s a statement, not an argument. If you’re going to start citing fallacies then I’m going to start expecting properly formed arguments.
That statement seems to be based exclusively on him being a union buster, despite the union busting happening 5 years after he left.


When did the union busting happen?


Strawman is arguing against a different argument than the one you are presenting.
I’m saying you’re not presenting an argument at all.


but fuck’em unions.
Are we still talking about the guy that stopped working for the company 5 years before the whole union busting thing happened?


Correct, and trying to get clarification as to what you claim the problem is is yielding no results, so I have to assume it’s non-existant.


Excellent time for the Japanese to drop ideogram/logogram system and have an alphabet like a functional language.
“All I said is that the Japanese do not have a functional language. I don’t understand where people think I was being derogatory about a specific race.”


I quoted you directly, stating that “if this turns out not to be true I take it back” which implies you have no strong evidence for it being true.


I’m responding to the arguments and evidence you are presenting. I know nothing of the situation so do not understand the basis of the claims you are making, and you don’t seem to be backing them up very well.


I did not mention an ethnicity. I mentioned you, specifically.


If he wasn’t part of the hiring decisions, I take back what I said.
So you have no idea if what you’re saying is even true?


So the union discord existed when he was there and he didn’t fire anyone involved. 5 years after he leaves someone else fires the people involved so… Fuck the guy who hired people and did nothing to prevent the discord server years ago?


I think ideograms suck because they are an extremely bad writing system, and imperial units suck because they are an extremely bad measurement system
And I think you suck because you are an extremely bad person.
Equivalent statement right?


I’m not following, he hired some people, then 5 years after he left someone else fired those people? Isn’t he more likely the good guy in the scenerio?
“How dare you give these people a job? That put them in a position where someone else could take away their job!”
Why am I still here?
Do the Nazis ever claim they are intolerant of minorities because the minorities were intolerant to them?