Why YSK GrapheneOS is a step above the rest. I understand it’s ironic de-google phone/tablet with google hardware, but it just works better then anything else. Permission toggles, pin scrambling, auto-reboot, scopes, MAC randomization, isolated user profiles, longer passwords, sandboxed apps, open source firmware, no bloat & the battery life is incredible now.

I hope people understand how easy it is to move to Linux & GrapheneOS full time & remove Apple, Google, Microsoft etc. It exceeded expectations so much so that I want to share it with other people. I cannot recommend this enough to improve your life. #FOSS

  • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not being deliberately deceptive. Google absolutely could whitelist GrapheneOS if Google chose to, just like any app developer can as well by checking for the verifiedBootState with proper verifiedBootKey (GrapheneOS attestation link below).

    Now, I don’t see Google doing that as GrapheneOS doesn’t and won’t ship with Play Store, Play services, or Service Framework. GrapehenOS actually has a compatibility layer so those don’t get special and device wide privileges like they do on devices that ship with them (sandboxed link below)…which Google probably requires. And I don’t see GrapheneOS budging on this as that’s one of their main selling points for security and privacy.

    But I’m always down to learn and I’m not a developer. I don’t suppose you have a link that says the main thing that Graphene is missing is handing over money to Google to get certified, and ideally how much? If that was it, I’d be willing to bet money Graphene would’ve forked over the cash by now.

    https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide

    https://grapheneos.org/usage#sandboxed-google-play

    • AncientMariner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hi google, can you approve our phone that basically cuts your apps out and offers privacy from your mass spying operation please? Such a weird point.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did acknowledge what you said by saying Google doesn’t want Graphene not including GMS stuff and won’t whitelist GrapheneOS, despite Graphene’s extra security measures. But this doesn’t change the fact that Google could…but won’t.

        • AncientMariner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When I got a degoogled phone, I’d already decided I do not trust Google with my data and I want to be far away from them. With that decision came the decision that I don’t consider them an authority I rely on, and don’t want their opinion on what is good and what isn’t. If people aren’t ready to degoogle, that is fine, but to ask google if it’s cool to degoogle is a an area where maybe folk aren’t ready to degoogle.